How Fair Value Gaps Reveal Hidden Institutional Intent

If you’ve ever wondered how institutions seem to “know” where price will revert before major moves, the answer often lies in Fair Value Gaps.

Plazo Sullivan’s methodology emphasizes that Fair Value Gaps act as magnets—not because retail traders watch them, but because institutions must mitigate the imbalance they caused.

The Science Behind Fair Value Gaps

An FVG forms when the market displaces violently in one direction, preventing the opposite side from offering liquidity at fair value.

The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs

Because institutions require massive liquidity, they often leave gaps behind due to the size of their orders.

A Simple, Professional FVG Workflow
1. Identify the Displacement

Displacement confirms that institutional activity caused the imbalance.

Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone

Highlight the zone between the prior candle’s high and the next candle’s low (or vice versa).

Patience Creates Precision

The best entries occur when price revisits the FVG, taps into get more info it, and shows signs of rejection or continuation.

4. Align With Market Structure

Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital’s bias framework—weekly, daily, liquidity mapping—acts as the filter that upgrades an FVG from “possible” to “high-probability.”

5. Use FVGs as Targets

Just as price gravitates back to FVGs for entries, it also moves toward FVGs when they act as future magnets.

The Result?

Fair Value Gaps give traders a rare glimpse into algorithmic intent.

Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.

FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *